Overview (Verses 77 - 79)

Unsuccessful Appeal
 
Turning back to Joseph’s brothers whose grudge against Joseph and his brother has been aroused, we find them trying their best to deny having anything to do with theft, while they attach it to the other branch of their father’s children: “They said: ‘If he  has  stolen  —  well,  a  brother  of  his  had  stolen  previously.’“ (Verse  77) There are countless reports which try to endorse their statement, quoting various excuses and legends, forgetting that these people had themselves previously lied to their father about  Joseph.  These attempts forget that they could lie again to Egypt’s  Chief Minister in order to deny their responsibility for an embarrassing act. They thus try to absolve themselves of anything to do with Joseph and his younger brother. Their action shows that they still harboured a grudge against both Joseph and his brother. Hence they put the blame squarely on these two.
 
“Joseph kept his secret to himself revealed nothing to them.” (Verse 77) He simply bore their accusation without showing that he was affected by it, knowing that both he and his brother were totally innocent. He only said to them: “You are in a far worse position.” (Verse 77) What this means is that their false accusation put them in a far worse position in God’s sight than that of the accused. His is a statement of fact, not an insult. “God knows best what you are speaking of” (Verse 77) This he says so as not to enter into any argument about their accusation, which he presumably had nothing to do with.
 

They, however, now start to feel the embarrassing situation they are in. They remembered the solemn pledge they gave to their father when he made it a condition of his consent to send their brother with them that they would “indeed bring him back to me”, unless the worst befell them. Hence they appeal to Joseph to let their younger brother return with them, pleading the suffering that his detention would cause to his old father. They offer one of themselves in his place, if he would not free him for the sake of his aged father. They further appeal to his kindness and compassion, saying to him: “Chief Minister, this lad has a father who is very old. Take one of us instead of him. We see that you are indeed a generous man.” (Verse 78)
 
Joseph, however, wanted to teach them a lesson, and he wanted to arouse their interest in the surprise he was preparing for them, and for his father and all who knew him, so that its effect would be appreciated by all. Hence he rejects their offer out of hand: “God forbid that we should take any other than the man with whom we found our property; for then we would be wrongdoers.” (Verse 79) He does not say that he would not take an innocent person in place of a thief, because he knew that his brother was no thief. He expresses the situation very precisely and accurately: “God forbid that we should take any other than the man with whom we found our property.” That is the whole situation without any addition to make the accusation appear true or false. He further comments, “for then we would be wrongdoers.” We have no wish to do anyone any wrong. That concludes the whole episode, and Joseph’s brothers knew then that their appeals would not bring any desired result. They retreated to reflect on the situation they now faced.