Overview (Verses 111 – 115)

Claims without Basis
 
The sūrah then deals with some general claims made by Jews and Christians, to the effect that they are the only righteous people who are assured of being admitted to heaven in the life to come. At the same time they continue to denounce and throw charges at each other. It then goes on to give God’s final word on the matter. “They declare, ‘None shall enter Paradise unless he is a Jew or a Christian.’ Such are their wishful fancies. Say, ‘Produce your proof, if what you say is true.’ Indeed, whoever surrender themselves to God, while doing good works, shall have their reward with their Lord; they shall have nothing to fear nor shall they grieve. The Jews say the Christians have no basis for their faith and the Christians say the Jews have no basis for their faith. Yet they both recite the Scriptures. Those devoid of knowledge say likewise, and on the Day of Judgement God shall judge between them on all their disputes.” (Verses 111-113)
 
Although, when the Qur’ān was being revealed, there was no strong Christian presence in Madinah, as compared to that of the Jews, the text refers to both groups as well as to the polytheists, dismissing their claims as baseless and challenging them to provide evidence to support their argument. “They declare: None shall enter Paradise unless he is a Jew or a Christian.” This is a dual report of what both groups argued. Otherwise, the Jews used to claim that only they were destined for heaven, and the Christians claimed that for themselves. Both statements are boastful, without supporting evidence. Hence, God instructs the Prophet to challenge their claims: “Say: ‘Produce your proof if what you say is true.’“ (Verse 111)
 
The sūrah then establishes another fundamental Islamic principle: that reward is commensurate with deed, without any preference for one nation, group or individual over another. Faith and submission to God, rather than title, ancestry or name, is the determining factor in this regard, and “whoever surrender themselves to God, while doing good works, shall have their reward with their Lord; they shall have nothing to fear nor shall they grieve.” (Verse 112)
 
This complements the earlier principle concerning punishment, when they claimed that the fire of hell would only touch them for a very brief period. They were told: “Those who earn evil and become engulfed by their sin are destined for the fire, where they shall abide.” (Verse 81) Thus, the complete Islamic concept of reward and punishment emerges.
 
Here again we find the most important feature of the Islamic faith: total, unconditional, mental and physical surrender to God. It is, however, a surrender that must be manifested in a practical form, expressed in the verse in the proviso, ‘while doing good works,’ because Islam makes a direct functional link between abstract belief and everyday behaviour, between faith and action, inner convictions and outward deeds. In this way, religious faith becomes a complete way of life, and man’s character and actions merge into a single entity — hence the generous reward granted by God Almighty to believers without discrimination or preference of one group over another. Those who willingly and completely surrender themselves to God “shall have their reward with their Lord; they shall have nothing to fear no shall they grieve.” (Verse 112)
 
While the Jews and the Christians were making those inflated and self-righteous claims, they were accusing each other of having no basis for their respective beliefs, which caused the Arabs “devoid of knowledge” to refuse both of them and throw the same charge back at them both.
 
This last phrase clearly refers to the illiterate idolaters of Arabia, who observed with bewilderment the polemical religious arguments and the incessant barrage of accusations and counter-accusations hurled at each other by Jews and Christians. They viewed both religious groups with disdain, not least because of the myths and superstitions that had crept into Jewish and Christian theology, which did not greatly differ from the Arabs’ own polytheistic beliefs, such as ascribing offspring to God. Accordingly, neither Judaism nor Christianity had much appeal for the people of Arabia.
 
The sūrah notes those accusations and controversies but leaves the final judgement to God, who “on the Day of Judgement shall judge between them on all their disputes”. It is to Him that all matters are ultimately referred. This is the fairest and most satisfactory way of dealing with these irrational and futile arguments, which were made by people whose exclusive claim to salvation and guidance has already been refuted.
 
There follow further denunciations of the Jews’ and Christians’ attempts to raise doubts in Muslim minds about the veracity of the Prophet’s teachings and instructions, especially those concerned with the change of the direction of prayer, or the qiblah. These attempts are considered tantamount to obstructing places of worship and keeping people out of them, or even seeking to destroy them. “Who is more unjust than he who forbids God’s name to be mentioned in His places of worship, and seeks to destroy them? Such people have no right to enter them except with fear in their hearts. They shall suffer ignominy in this world and awesome suffering awaits them in the life to come. To God belong the east and the west: wherever you turn there will be the face of God. Truly, God is limitless in His bounty and He knows all.” (Verses 114-115)
 
The immediate impression one gets from these two verses is that they relate to the qiblah issue and to Jewish efforts to dissuade the Muslims from turning in prayer towards the Ka`bah, in Makkah. Other accounts, however, speak of different circumstances for their revelation.
 
The verses are phrased in general terms and may therefore be interpreted generally. The same applies to the consequences of hindering the use of God’s places of worship or destroying them. Those who perpetrate such acts deserve to be unceasingly pursued and relentlessly harassed, unless they seek refuge in the sanctuary of places of worship. It was in this spirit that on the day the Muslims conquered Makkah in August 630 CE, the Prophet Muĥammad ordered a general amnesty declaring that anyone who entered the sacred mosque would be safe. Many of the Arab enemies of Islam did exactly that. These were the very people who prevented the Prophet and his followers from entering the sacred mosque in Makkah, making it clear that they would go to war, if necessary, to stop the Muslims from entering. Furthermore, they are now warned of a double punishment: “They shall suffer ignominy in this world and awesome suffering awaits them in the life to come.” (Verse 114)
 
However, another interpretation of the statement “Such people have no right to enter them except with fear in their hearts” emphasizes the fact that those who hinder or impede the use of places of worship should themselves only enter such places in fear of God and in total submission to Him. That would be the most appropriate way for them to show respect for these places and to acknowledge God’s power and glory.
 
But what makes us favour the view that the two verses were revealed in connection with the qiblah issue is the verse that comes immediately after them, stating: “To God belong the east and the west; wherever you turn there will be the face of God. Truly, God is limitless in His bounty, and He knows all.” (Verse 115) Clearly this verse comes as a response to Jewish lies and false contentions that prayers offered by Muslims facing Jerusalem were worthless and in vain. It is saying that in the final analysis prayer is valid whatever direction a worshipper faces, because God’s face will be there. To specify a particular direction is no more than a matter of discipline. It does not mean that God’s face is found in one direction rather than another. After all, God does not wish to make things difficult for people, nor would He want to take away their reward or devalue it: “Truly, God is limitless in His bounty and He knows all.” (Verse 115)
 
 

Overview (Verses 111 – 115)

Claims without Basis
 
The sūrah then deals with some general claims made by Jews and Christians, to the effect that they are the only righteous people who are assured of being admitted to heaven in the life to come. At the same time they continue to denounce and throw charges at each other. It then goes on to give God’s final word on the matter. “They declare, ‘None shall enter Paradise unless he is a Jew or a Christian.’ Such are their wishful fancies. Say, ‘Produce your proof, if what you say is true.’ Indeed, whoever surrender themselves to God, while doing good works, shall have their reward with their Lord; they shall have nothing to fear nor shall they grieve. The Jews say the Christians have no basis for their faith and the Christians say the Jews have no basis for their faith. Yet they both recite the Scriptures. Those devoid of knowledge say likewise, and on the Day of Judgement God shall judge between them on all their disputes.” (Verses 111-113)
 
Although, when the Qur’ān was being revealed, there was no strong Christian presence in Madinah, as compared to that of the Jews, the text refers to both groups as well as to the polytheists, dismissing their claims as baseless and challenging them to provide evidence to support their argument. “They declare: None shall enter Paradise unless he is a Jew or a Christian.” This is a dual report of what both groups argued. Otherwise, the Jews used to claim that only they were destined for heaven, and the Christians claimed that for themselves. Both statements are boastful, without supporting evidence. Hence, God instructs the Prophet to challenge their claims: “Say: ‘Produce your proof if what you say is true.’“ (Verse 111)
 
The sūrah then establishes another fundamental Islamic principle: that reward is commensurate with deed, without any preference for one nation, group or individual over another. Faith and submission to God, rather than title, ancestry or name, is the determining factor in this regard, and “whoever surrender themselves to God, while doing good works, shall have their reward with their Lord; they shall have nothing to fear nor shall they grieve.” (Verse 112)
 
This complements the earlier principle concerning punishment, when they claimed that the fire of hell would only touch them for a very brief period. They were told: “Those who earn evil and become engulfed by their sin are destined for the fire, where they shall abide.” (Verse 81) Thus, the complete Islamic concept of reward and punishment emerges.
 
Here again we find the most important feature of the Islamic faith: total, unconditional, mental and physical surrender to God. It is, however, a surrender that must be manifested in a practical form, expressed in the verse in the proviso, ‘while doing good works,’ because Islam makes a direct functional link between abstract belief and everyday behaviour, between faith and action, inner convictions and outward deeds. In this way, religious faith becomes a complete way of life, and man’s character and actions merge into a single entity — hence the generous reward granted by God Almighty to believers without discrimination or preference of one group over another. Those who willingly and completely surrender themselves to God “shall have their reward with their Lord; they shall have nothing to fear no shall they grieve.” (Verse 112)
 
While the Jews and the Christians were making those inflated and self-righteous claims, they were accusing each other of having no basis for their respective beliefs, which caused the Arabs “devoid of knowledge” to refuse both of them and throw the same charge back at them both.
 
This last phrase clearly refers to the illiterate idolaters of Arabia, who observed with bewilderment the polemical religious arguments and the incessant barrage of accusations and counter-accusations hurled at each other by Jews and Christians. They viewed both religious groups with disdain, not least because of the myths and superstitions that had crept into Jewish and Christian theology, which did not greatly differ from the Arabs’ own polytheistic beliefs, such as ascribing offspring to God. Accordingly, neither Judaism nor Christianity had much appeal for the people of Arabia.
 
The sūrah notes those accusations and controversies but leaves the final judgement to God, who “on the Day of Judgement shall judge between them on all their disputes”. It is to Him that all matters are ultimately referred. This is the fairest and most satisfactory way of dealing with these irrational and futile arguments, which were made by people whose exclusive claim to salvation and guidance has already been refuted.
 
There follow further denunciations of the Jews’ and Christians’ attempts to raise doubts in Muslim minds about the veracity of the Prophet’s teachings and instructions, especially those concerned with the change of the direction of prayer, or the qiblah. These attempts are considered tantamount to obstructing places of worship and keeping people out of them, or even seeking to destroy them. “Who is more unjust than he who forbids God’s name to be mentioned in His places of worship, and seeks to destroy them? Such people have no right to enter them except with fear in their hearts. They shall suffer ignominy in this world and awesome suffering awaits them in the life to come. To God belong the east and the west: wherever you turn there will be the face of God. Truly, God is limitless in His bounty and He knows all.” (Verses 114-115)
 
The immediate impression one gets from these two verses is that they relate to the qiblah issue and to Jewish efforts to dissuade the Muslims from turning in prayer towards the Ka`bah, in Makkah. Other accounts, however, speak of different circumstances for their revelation.
 
The verses are phrased in general terms and may therefore be interpreted generally. The same applies to the consequences of hindering the use of God’s places of worship or destroying them. Those who perpetrate such acts deserve to be unceasingly pursued and relentlessly harassed, unless they seek refuge in the sanctuary of places of worship. It was in this spirit that on the day the Muslims conquered Makkah in August 630 CE, the Prophet Muĥammad ordered a general amnesty declaring that anyone who entered the sacred mosque would be safe. Many of the Arab enemies of Islam did exactly that. These were the very people who prevented the Prophet and his followers from entering the sacred mosque in Makkah, making it clear that they would go to war, if necessary, to stop the Muslims from entering. Furthermore, they are now warned of a double punishment: “They shall suffer ignominy in this world and awesome suffering awaits them in the life to come.” (Verse 114)
 
However, another interpretation of the statement “Such people have no right to enter them except with fear in their hearts” emphasizes the fact that those who hinder or impede the use of places of worship should themselves only enter such places in fear of God and in total submission to Him. That would be the most appropriate way for them to show respect for these places and to acknowledge God’s power and glory.
 
But what makes us favour the view that the two verses were revealed in connection with the qiblah issue is the verse that comes immediately after them, stating: “To God belong the east and the west; wherever you turn there will be the face of God. Truly, God is limitless in His bounty, and He knows all.” (Verse 115) Clearly this verse comes as a response to Jewish lies and false contentions that prayers offered by Muslims facing Jerusalem were worthless and in vain. It is saying that in the final analysis prayer is valid whatever direction a worshipper faces, because God’s face will be there. To specify a particular direction is no more than a matter of discipline. It does not mean that God’s face is found in one direction rather than another. After all, God does not wish to make things difficult for people, nor would He want to take away their reward or devalue it: “Truly, God is limitless in His bounty and He knows all.” (Verse 115)